|
Anabaptist Group Dynamics
Anabaptists Today
Anabaptism History
Anabaptist
Theology
Baptism
Canada Journal
CaringBridge
Commands of Jesus
Community
Difference between Anabaptists and Evangelicals
Divorce
Home Page
Hutterian Brethren
Hutterite Sermon #1
Hutterite Sermon #2
Hutterite Tract
Marriage (Ulrich Stadler)
Living Word (Ulrich Stadler)
Modern views of Anabaptists
Mysteries of the Kingdom of God
Newsletters
April 2001
Our Story
Pacifism
Photos
Psalm 23
Salvation
Secret of the Strength
Sermons by Eli Hofer
03/14/01
08/22/01
08/11/02
The Writings of Ulrich Stadler
Volume 1
Volume 2
Volume 3
Volume 4
Things Hutterite
To Vote or not to Vote
Way of the Lord
Which Kingdom?
| |
Patriot of an invisible Realm
Here is a letter that Kevin Brendler wrote in response to an article by a man
named Kevin Benderman on the subject of war.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Mr. Benderman wrote: “I have come to the conclusion that there are no valid
arguments for the destructive force of war. . . . we could, and should, consider
better ways to solve our differences with other people in the world.”
Authentic Christians should not use this "we" language when it comes to the
State actions of their host countries. The State has every right to engage in a
war which it deems to be in its self-defense. The followers of Jesus recognize
this God-given right of every State government. We, the followers of Jesus, do
not criticize the State for adopting violent means to secure what it feels to be
necessary for its own preservation against malignant forces.
What I write here is not to be taken as a justification for the particular
military engagements in which the United States is presently occupied. I am only
concerned that Mr. Benderman has not rightly grasped the distinctly Christian
reason why the followers of Jesus do not take up the carnal weapons of this
world and fight. It is NOT because there are no valid arguments for the
destructive force of war. Of course there very well may be such legitimate
arguments, on occasion, if you are the Secretary of Defense or a State military
official of some sort. There are, in fact, some "differences with other people"
that a State power can settle in no other way than by violent measures. The
followers of Jesus concede that such use of violent force is the State's
prerogative and binding upon all those employed by the State as soldiers.
Our complaint is not that the State goes to war, but that the professed
followers of Jesus have voluntarily entered the ranks of the soldiery and bound
themselves over to State interests. This is the truly inexplicable thing and
shocking incongruence. Not that a nation goes to war, but that the professed
disciples of Christ are nationalists.
There are plenty of legitimate arguments for the destructive force of war, but
none whatsoever for Christian participation in the destruction. Mr. Benderman
needs to make these distinctions and present his case for the renunciation of
violence with a sharp Christian edge. For though we have repudiated the use of
carnal weapons, we are never to relinquish our Sword.
I trust you won't mind too terribly this venting of some emotional energy which
Mr. Benderman's piece evoked within me.
Patriot of an invisible Realm,
Kevin Brendler
See Don Murphy's related article
Home
Last updated 03/02/2005
|